Just watching Silvia Browne on Montel (she doesn’t say much different from I would (logical and practical, cold & hot reading) and I would say so much more (because of telepathic, clairsentient, and claircognizant skills) so I wonder…) but what really stood out was this:
1. The questioners provide “too much” background. Honestly it’s unnecessary and c can lead the psychic to focusing on what you are saying and using that in their response back to you.
2. “Will it happen soon?” Trust me, professional readers know you want everything “soon” or “now”. It’s best to leave it out of your question because a psychic could be “lead” to give you a sooner rather than later date to appease.
3. Don’t be tied to outcomes. When you do that, there is no room for information or messages to be chanelled to you; you get what you give. Be open when you get a reading.
4. A lot of information I get can be “weird” or not the “common” understanding of what a word means. When questioners said, “no, that’s not it”, Slyvia would spin it.
At least that’s what it looked like but the thing is I experience that all the time. I say a word like “relationship” and someone thinks it’s a “romantic” relationship but it doesn’t have to be. It can be a family, friend, co-workers, or romantic relationship.
I keep it general instead of highly specific because that’s the way the messages are passed to me. If I get a strong impression to specify it, I will otherwise the information is just as valid and useful to the questioner.
Anyway, Sylvia had to reword or re-explain what she was getting at, this to me is “normal” and as I said in the next post she does have psychic ability…
I’m just not certain she should be charging as much as she does because it doesn’t seem to be an exceptionally strong ability (of course I could be wrong) with giving high specifcs and accuracy.
