Archive for the ‘Abella Arthur’ Category

Diskeptics vs. Believers: The age old battle continues

Friday, August 3rd, 2007

Diskeptics vs. Believers

The following are typical diskeptic (scientific skeptic rather than just skeptic) comments and my rebuttal.

Diskeptic: A psychic shouldn’t charge until predictions have come true.

Believer: Predictions are not the only reason to go to a psychic.

Diskeptic: A psychic shouldn’t charge until predictions have come true.

Believer: What are the chances that someone is going to come back years later to pay the psychic or even remember that the psychic made the prediction that came true?

Diskeptic: A psychic shouldn’t charge until predictions have come true.

Believer: Freewill or Godwill can affect a prediction. A prediction is based on the past and present conditions to divine the future. It may or may not come true, and sometimes that’s a great thing! Consider weather and sports forecasters.

Diskeptic: Psychic ability or tool use is not a science.

Believer: The information possessed is coming from ancient wisdom and heightened conscious ability. If we are to consider the dictionary definition of “science” (the study of the natural world, a branch of knowledge using objectivity and involving observation and experimentation, etc.) to be true, then psychic ability and tools such as tarot, astrology, and numerology is a science that was honed by the ancient peoples of the world.

Diskeptic: Psychics are scam artists.

Believer: There’s not much credibility in that statement since a lot of de-bunkers are magicians who are scamming and tricking people on a regular basis.

Diskeptic: If magicians can duplicate psychic ability than psychic ability can not exist.

Believer: That’s like saying: If a F/X special effects technician can replicate blood than blood can not exist.

Diskeptic: Prove to us that what you do works.

Believer: Proving to others is a shadow activity. It’s better to receive validation internally.

Diskeptic: I don’t believe in psychic powers.

Believer: Neither do I. We all have power that many have taken away from them. Power is a self possessing ability that everyone has.

Diskeptic: I don’t believe psychics are gifted.

Believer: I believe psychics have a gift but then so does everyone else that does something well or different from the majority. In other words, everyone has a gift.

Diskeptic: Psychics are scam artists.

Believer: While there are people out there who scam others, it can happen in every profession. What’s important here is to be self-responsible and put these people out of business. Be more skeptical and discerning and understand what your needs and desires are. If it’s too good to be true and you don’t need to work for your desire, than it’s probably a scam.

Diskeptic: Believe includes the word “lie”.

Believer: This is an etymology issue. Up until the 17th century, “Beleeve” was the common spelling. This basically meant to be in like, love, or desire.

Diskeptic: If they were truly psychic they shouldn’t charge for what they do..

Believer: What psychics do is energetically demanding. Also if they were doing something else for money, they may not have the time, energy, or ability to read for others on a professional basis anyway. And it’s senseless to me to tell someone to work at something they may be less capable of doing just because you say they shouldn’t charge for their so called “gift”. That means a lot of people shouldn’t be charge for the fine services they offer. *senseless*

Diskeptic: Psychics use cold reading.

Believer: So do normal people. Using cold reading is looking at someone and making judgements about that person. When a psychic makes these judgements it’s often much more than an average person would make which is what makes them so fascinating. For example: Face reading is a form of cold reading that tells a lot about the person that much of the population is not consciously aware of nor would they be able to professionally talk to someone about their findings either. Also most professional psychics do not use cold reading as their sole form of divination or insights.

Diskeptic: Psychics use general statements that apply to everyone.

Believer: General statements apply to most everyone because most everyone experiences the same common experience. However, if you are a professional psychic you are going to say some very specific things related to the past, present (rather than just the past), or knowable future that only applies to the person you are reading for. Also general paper horoscopes are not specific to an individual but rather a group of people. It’s a horoscope for a sun sign but not an individual so it may or may not apply.

A rebuttal to James Randi’s, one million challenge

Abella Arthur (Numerologist) 777 & Getting Married on July 7 2007

Friday, July 6th, 2007

Further to the interview through CBC Radio World at Six. Audio File.

A number is neither lucky or unlucky; however, the circumstances around the number can change it to a positive or negative situation.

7 means a lot of things, such as, mysticism, mystery, the unknown, science, privacy, solitude, detachment, divine intervention, spirituality, introversion, introspection, advanced intelligence, and God.

For those that like taking risks and gambling, 7 is a lucky number…

This Saturday it’s 7/7/7 and taking a look at whether that’s an unlucky or lucky day to get married it’s important to understand what the couples goals. 777 is associated with gambling and winning the jackpot and adds up to “party time 3”; however, the date July 7 2007 adds up to a 5 and 5, amongst other things, means change, risk, and potential surprises. Therefore people who like to take a gamble, will find this date to be lucky. But luck doesn’t support a marriage during the hard times.

If you didn’t secure July 7 2007 as your wedding date, try any combination of 3 and 4 which would be 3, 4,12,13,21, 22, 30,and 31 OR if you can wait until next year choose August 8 2008, 8/8/8 which means power, wealth, and health and many couples are looking for that in their marriage.

Aside from marriage, this Saturday is a great day for reflection, investigation, taking tests, being tested, music, and meditation (or listening to God). 🙂

Scientific Skeptics (diskeptics) Are Naughty

Monday, July 2nd, 2007

A lot of diskeptic behaviour is unfair, exhausting, disrespectful, dishonest, disproving, untrustworthy, and unbalanced. Diskeptic actions can be frustrating and their illogical mental mind games, which they like to play, are designed to make you look stupid and discredit you at all costs. Which, by the way, tends to entertain them and others with their holier than thou attitude!!

Diskeptics play dirty and they are out to WIN in any which way possible! No wonder there’s that silly Randi *prize* which the majority of psychics couldn’t care less about. Pretty crafty!! In fact, I would say diskeptics are great designers of tests meant to fail.

Diskeptics have little interest in the never-ending seeking of truth; they are hell-bent on disproving that paranormal and/or psychic activities are genuine. It’s one thing to have skeptical open minded doubt, it’s another to be on a mission of close mindedness!

Also a diskeptics interest in laughing at people (they don’t agree with or believe in) and wanting them to look like idiots while attempting to discredit is uncouth and in effect, I believe, actually makes them look ridiculous.

And what’s with diskeptics saying it’s horrible that professional psychics are deceiving the general public with baseless readings but somehow their magician’s tricks and deception are okay because it’s for the betterment of mankind? That’s senseless, biased, and puts diskeptics on a pedestal.

Professional psychics, like myself, believe in what we do and that it is one of many ways to help a person have a better personal life, career, or business. So what makes diskeptics so special?

In future, when I engage with these people I will know what they are after and behave accordingly. In fact, I will be downright skeptical (in the way skeptical really means)!!

Now having said all this, I love shows like Penn & Teller’s Bullshit and James Randi’s quest. They are entertaining, make me think or re-evaluate my beliefs, poke fun at what I do (why be so serious about life?!), and they do help people keep safe from genuine scam artists. I WANT diskeptics to exist (without the *dis* if that were even possible) but since scientific skeptics pretty much play dirty I have little interest in engaging one-on-one with those prickly humans.

Skeptics were once powerful practicioners of the paranormal!

Sunday, July 1st, 2007

My belief (theory, hypothesis, opinion, etc.) is that diskeptics (scientific skeptics who disrespect the beliefs of others with degrading language and who want to disprove rather than prove the existence of paranormal activities) were, in a past life, very powerful magical and psychic beings who misused their gift and power.

Therefore, in this life they do not have the ability to use their gift and power or if they do they “out” themselves and yet they feel connected to the paranormal as if it should exist. This is why JackDirt’s comment “Believe me of all people who want to see God the most it is the skeptics.” on the Ordinary Mystic blog was cool to read and rang very true to me. 🙂

This lock on the skeptic’s previous power is a way to keep us safe from those which would harm us. So now they are left with an obsession of disqualifying that which they once did with ease. The universe rocks!

Also scientific skeptics (without the degrading language element) are an important balance in this world. What better punishment is it than for a skeptic that misused their abilities in a past life to not only NOT be able to use them in this life but to keep us safe from scam artists and others who would hurt us with paranormal or psychic ability?

I would not want to get rid of scientific skeptics unless humanity can be fully educated on how to distinguish between a fake and the real deal AND if professional readers were focused on social work and professional behaviour rather than just making a buck.

Of course, this theory is likely to be VERY laughable to a diskeptic and you know what — that’s the way it should be!! 😉